Is the End of “Spousal Refusal” Really Anything to be Upset About?

Is the End of “Spousal Refusal” Really Anything to be Upset About?.

About these ads

div { margin-top: 1em; } #google_ads_div_wpcom_below_post_adsafe_ad_container { display: block !important; }
]]>

LEGAL CLAIMS OF FRUAD USED TO SUE FOR ELDER ABUSE AND FINANCIAL EXPLOITATION

By Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. a NJ Elder Abuse and Fraud Exploitation Law Firm
 

New Jersey law recognizes a number of legal claims of fraud against the elderly, each of which allows attorneys to sue the perpetrators. Common types of fraud include fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, constructive fraud and fraudulent inducement.

Fraudulent Misrepresentation.

 Fraudulent misrepresentation occurs when a person knowingly misrepresents an important fact for another person with fact with the intention of inducing that person to enter into a transaction; and the elderly or incapacitated person in fact relies on the misrepresentation in doing so.

Fraudulent Concealment.

 Fraudulent concealment is similar, but the exploiter conceals (hides), rather than misrepresents, the important fact which he or she is under a legal or moral obligation to disclose, and the latter party does not know or would not have entered into the transaction if the material fact had been disclosed and made known.

Constructive Fraud.

 Constructive fraud occurs when the exploiter abuses or takes advantage of a fiduciary relationship for his or her own enrichment under circumstances which do not qualify as legal fraud.

Contact me personally today to discuss your New Jersey elder abuse and/or financial exploitation matter.  I am easy to talk to, very approachable and can offer you practical, legal ways to handle your concerns.  You can reach me toll free at (855) 376-5291 or e-mail me at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.

DISINHERITING A SPOUSE UNDER NEW JERSEY PROBATE LAW

By Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. a Freehold, Monmouth County Probate Attorney in  New Jersey

Divorce sucks!  It is destructive on so many levels causing those involved to question why the relationship failed.  Then there are the implications of New Jersey’s elective share law when death comes and a Last Will is filed for probate.

The Will specifically disinherits his or her spouse.  The question then raised is whether under New Jersey probate law is can you disinherit your spouse in New Jersey.  Law provides that a disinherited spouse under a Will of the deceased spouse is entitled to a one third share of the augmented estate of the deceased spouse. The augmented estate means that the value of the estate is reduced by funeral and administration expenses and any enforceable claims before the one third share is calculated and divided.

However, a surviving spouse receives the one third elective share after the death of the first spouse when a surviving spouse has not been living separate and apart, or has not ceased to cohabit with his or her spouse as man and wife and no divorce from bed and board or other action which has been filed has released the parties from the bonds of marriage.

In New Jersey the one third elective share is applicable to domestic partner relationships as well.

Contact me personally today to discuss your New Jersey probate matter.  I am easy to talk to, very approachable and can offer you practical, legal ways to handle your concerns.  You can reach me toll free at (855) 376-5291 or e-mail me at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com.

FEDERAL COURT REAFFIRMS USE OF ANNUITIES IN NEW JERSEY MEDICAID PLANNING

By Fredrick P. Niemann, Esq. of Hanlon Niemann, a Wall Township Medicaid Attorney

A recent New Jersey federal court decision once again has upheld the use of annuities as an asset protection planning device for Medicaid eligibility. In New Jersey, to qualify for Medicaid, an individual must be spent down for almost no assets and his or her income be insufficient to pay for the cost of long term care.

When dealing with a married couple, Medicaid includes the assets of both spouses. No matter which spouse legally owns the asset to Medicaid the asset is owned by both spouses. Because of this, the law permits the spouse who does not need care (called the “community spouse”) to retain a limited amount of assets including the house, a car, and up to a maximum of $115,000 in cash. All other assets must be spent down for care before the prospective “institutionalized spouse,” can qualify for Medicaid.

New Jersey treats income differently than assets. Income belongs exclusively to the spouse to whom the check is made payable. This is known as the “name on the check” rule. If a spouse receives Social Security of $1,000 per month and a pension of $500 per month, then that $1,500 is his or her income and does not have to be contributed towards the case of the sick spouses Medicaid monthly income.

Only if the institutionalized spouse’s monthly income exceeds the cost of care would he or she be ineligible for the Medicaid program. For example, if the institutionalized spouse resides in a nursing home and the nursing home cost $9,000 per month, but the institutionalized spouse has fixed monthly income of $11,000 per month, then the institutionalized spouse does not qualify for Medicaid. The amount of his income would exceed the cost of his care so he is ineligible for Medicaid.

Annuities are used as Medicaid eligibility and a planning technique to convert exposed and valuable assets into a stream of income that belongs to the community spouse, exclusively not the institutionalized spouse.

In the recent federal court case, New Jersey challenged certain wording in the Medicaid annuity contract, claiming that the wording prevented the annuity from complying with the requirements of the Medicaid laws. The federal court ruled against the State, holding that the annuity did comply with all of the requirements of the Medicaid laws. This case is yet another federal victory in a long string of federal victories on the subject of annuities planning in the context of Medicaid.

Contact me personally today to discuss your New Jersey Medicaid matter. I am easy to talk to, very approachable and can offer you practical, legal ways to handle your concerns. You can reach me toll free at (855) 376-5291 or e-mail me at fniemann@hnlawfirm.com

A well-kept secret may allow couples to keep more assets and still qualify for Medicaid.

top secretThis article will explain a little-used technique that allows a married couple who have income below a certain amount to be able to keep more assets than are typically allowable for married couples in Medicaid cases. Using this process, our office has handled cases where, with our involvement,  couples were allowed to keep over $100,000 more than what Medicaid normally allows. It is not something you will typically hear about from nursing home social workers or most Medicaid caseworkers. It is one of the best kept secrets in the Medicaid eligibility process.

First, an explanation of basic Medicaid “spousal impoverishment” rules. (If you are familiar with these, you can skip down to the part that explains the process to keep additional assets.) When a couple is married, and one spouse needs nursing home care, Medicaid will provide coverage of the cost of care if the couple meets financial eligibility rules. These rules are commonly referred to as “spousal impoverishment” rules but actually, that is a misnomer. The current set of rules regarding eligibility for married couples is based on federal law that was put into place by Congress to prevent spouses from becoming impoverished if only one needed nursing home care. Therefore, they really aren’t “spousal impoverishment” rules, they are “spousal anti-impoverishment” rules. These rules also apply where there is a married couple and the spouse needing care is applying for Family Care benefits — not in the nursing home. Technically, the spouse applying for benefits is called the “institutionalized spouse” – either in a nursing home or applying for Family Care – and the spouse who is not applying, and lives in the community – is called the “community spouse.” The “institutionalized spouse” could also be referred to as the “nursing home spouse.”

Assets: Under these rules, the allowable amount of assets that the couple can have to qualify for Medicaid is between $50,000 and $115,920, plus $2000 for the nursing home spouse.  The house is not counted in this total as long as it is worth less than $750,000. A few other things are not counted also, such as retirement funds that belong to the spouse who remains in the community (called the “community spouse”). Even with some exclusions, these totals are significantly less than what is estimated that a couple should save for a comfortable retirement.

Income: There are also rules related to income. These rules say that once the nursing home spouse is eligible (based on meeting the asset test described above), he or she may in some cases be able to transfer a certain amount of income every month to the community spouse.  This transfer is allowable only in cases where the community spouse has less than $2585-2898 in his or her own income per month. In those cases, the nursing home spouse can transfer income, but only enough to bring the community spouse’s total income to that level. The exact amount within this range is based on the amount of expenses for “shelter” that the community spouse incurs. So you take the appropriate income allocation amount, and subtract the community spouse’s income, and the difference is what the institutionalized spouse can transfer.

As you can see, it is fair to say that there is some calculating involved, both in determining the right asset level that a couple might have, and in determining the amount of income, if any, that the nursing home spouse can transfer to the community spouse. An experienced elder law attorney can help couples figure out these numbers to the greatest advantage of the couple. This is not something that nursing home social workers or county Medicaid workers are known for doing well. I have seen far too many couples who spent much more than they had to, because a social worker did not bother to analyze the situation carefully and use appropriate deductions and calculations.

Here is a basic example of how things work:

Bob and Joy are a married couple living in Grafton, Wisconsin. Bob has a stroke and is hospitalized, then transferred to a skilled nursing home. Unfortunately, it appears that this will be a long term and possibly permanent situation for Bob.  At the time Bob is hospitalized, the couple owns the following assets: a home with a home equity line of credit that has $20,000 outstanding, with monthly payments of $500. The home is valued at $250,000. The value of the home does not count for Medicaid purposes. They have two CD’s totaling $150,000 and a checking account valued at $10,000. Their total countable assets for Medicaid purposes are $160,000. Under traditional spousal impoverishment rules, Bob will qualify for Medicaid to pay for the nursing home, once their countable assets are reduced to $82,000 ($80,000 to go to Joy as the community spouse, and $2000 for Bob.)

After this asset level is reached, and Bob is eligible for Medicaid, then a calculation is made as to whether any of Bob’s income can go to Joy. First, Bob gets to keep a monthly allowance of $45. Then, other things can be subtracted which we won’t go into here. Then we can figure out how much of the leftover funds Bob can transfer to Joy. Let’s assume that the income allowance for Joy is the maximum, $2898. If Bob’s income from Social Security is $2000, and Joy’s income from Social Security is $600, then Bob would be allowed to transfer all of his monthly income to Joy if he chose to do so, because her income plus his income is less than the maximum ($600 + $2000 = $2600) However, if Joy’s income is $1500 per month, then Bob can only transfer $1398 to her, because $2898 (the maximum) – $1500 (Joy’s income) is $1398. If he keeps his $45 personal allowance he would actually transfer even less.

In any event, all this background is leading up to telling you about an exception to these general rules.

The little-used way to keep additional assets: The exception has been around for many years, but the way it works has been changed by the Medicaid changes in the most recent Wisconsin budget act.  The general principle of the exception is that in some cases, a couple can be allowed to keep more assets by showing it is necessary to generate income for the community spouse. The exception comes into play in those cases where the community spouse’s income, even with the funds that have been transferred from the institutionalized spouse, is less than the $2585-2898 range I have listed above.

The law says that where a couple’s combined income is below that spousal income level, then the couple can ask to be allowed to increase the amount of assets they can keep. The purpose of the increase is to generate additional income.

Under new Medicaid rules, the amount of additional assets the couples can keep is based on the amount of funds that could be used to purchase an immediate lifetime annuity. So, using the example where Bob has $2000 in income and Joy has $600, and the applicable allowance is $2898, then we need to figure out how much the monthly income should be. This is because Bob and Joy’s combined income is less than $2898. When Bob takes out his $45 personal allowance, he only has $1955 to transfer to Joy, bringing her total income up to $2555, which is $253 less than the maximum allowance. Bob and Joy are both 75. We will look at an immediate annuity for Joy, with monthly payments of $253 per month. You can check and may get a variety of answers depending on which company you choose. One company will give an estimate of $34,769. This means that instead of having an asset limit of $82,000, Bob and Joy would have an asset limit of $116,769. After receiving an increased asset level based on that annuity amount, Bob and Joy are not actually required to purchase an annuity (although they certainly could choose to do so.) They could simply keep the funds in savings.piggy bank 1

This increase can only be obtained by using the state fair hearing process. The hearing process can also be used to increase the monthly income a community spouse may keep, but it involves different facts and analysis. In many cases it is well worth the extra effort to go through this process. Experienced elder law attorneys can help you understand whether it makes sense for you to go through this process, and can help you maximize the results.

About these ads

div { margin-top: 1em; } #google_ads_div_wpcom_below_post_adsafe_ad_container { display: block !important; }
]]>